Schein's Model of Organisational Culture
Schein's Model of Organisational Culture is a framework developed by the American organisational psychologist Edgar H. Schein to explain how culture within an organisation operates across different levels of visibility and awareness.
What it is
Schein's Model of Organisational Culture is a framework developed by the American organisational psychologist Edgar H. Schein to explain how organisational culture operates across different levels of visibility and awareness. The model proposes that organisational culture is not a single, observable phenomenon but rather a layered structure consisting of three distinct levels: Artefacts, Espoused Values and Beliefs, and Basic Underlying Assumptions. Each layer differs in its visibility to observers and its depth of embedding in the organisation.
At its core, the model argues that the most powerful cultural forces within an organisation are also the least visible. What employees, customers, or new recruits observe on the surface - the office layout, dress codes, rituals, and stated mission statements - represents only the outermost shell of a far deeper cultural reality. The deeper you look, Schein contends, the more fundamental and resistant to change the cultural elements become.
For business leaders and students alike, the model provides an invaluable lens for diagnosing cultural challenges, understanding why change programmes fail, and designing interventions that are genuinely transformative rather than merely cosmetic.
The Three Levels of Culture
Level 1: Artefacts: These are the visible, tangible manifestations of culture. They include physical structures (office design, dress codes, branding), observed behaviours (how meetings are run, how people greet one another), and organisational outputs (products, annual reports, websites). Artefacts are easy to observe but notoriously difficult to interpret without understanding the deeper layers that give them meaning. A casual, open-plan office may reflect genuine collaborative values - or it may be a superficial design choice at odds with a deeply hierarchical internal culture.
Level 2: Espoused Values and Beliefs: This layer comprises the stated strategies, goals, philosophies, and values that the organisation officially endorses. These are the principles articulated in value statements, leadership speeches, and policy documents. However, a critical distinction must be drawn between espoused values - what the organisation says it believes - and enacted values - what is actually rewarded, tolerated, and modelled in practice. When there is misalignment between the two, employees rapidly detect the inconsistency, and trust erodes.
Level 3: Basic Underlying Assumptions: This is the deepest and most influential level. These are the unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs and assumptions that are so thoroughly internalised by members of the organisation that they are rarely, if ever, articulated or questioned. They determine how people perceive, think, and feel about issues such as the nature of authority, the appropriate pace of decision-making, what constitutes acceptable risk, and the relationship between the individual and the group. Because these assumptions operate below conscious awareness, they are extremely difficult to surface, challenge, and change.
Background
Edgar H. Schein (1928–2023) was Professor Emeritus at the MIT Sloan School of Management and one of the most influential figures in the field of organisational psychology. His intellectual foundations were shaped by his early training under Kurt Lewin, the pioneer of change theory, and his subsequent work on socialisation, career development, and process consultation.
Schein first articulated his model of organisational culture in the early 1980s, a period of intense scholarly and managerial interest in culture as a driver of organisational performance. His landmark book, Organizational Culture and Leadership, first published in 1985, brought the model to a wide audience and established it as a central reference point in the field. The book has since been revised through multiple editions, with the fifth edition appearing in 2017.
Schein developed the model in part as a response to what he saw as overly simplistic treatments of organisational culture in both academic research and popular management literature. Many contemporary frameworks treated culture as something that could be easily described through surveys, typologies, or lists of values. Schein argued that this approach missed the essential depth and dynamism of how culture actually functions. His three-level model was designed to capture the complexity and the essentially hidden nature of the most powerful cultural forces.
Schein was also deeply influenced by his practical consulting work with major corporations, through which he observed first-hand how cultural forces could undermine even the most carefully designed change initiatives. This grounding in real organisational life gave his theoretical model practical credibility that continues to resonate with practitioners and academics alike.
When to use it
Schein's model is most powerfully deployed when an organisation faces questions or challenges that cannot be explained purely through structural, strategic, or operational analysis. Specifically, leaders and consultants should reach for this framework in the following situations:
- A change programme is failing despite logical rationale. When employees intellectually understand why a change is necessary but continue to resist or undermine it, the obstacle is almost certainly located at the level of underlying assumptions rather than artefacts or stated values.
- Following a merger or acquisition. When two organisations combine, they bring distinct cultural layers into contact. Conflicts that appear to be about process or structure are frequently cultural clashes at a much deeper level. The model provides a diagnostic tool for mapping where cultures are compatible and where tensions lie.
- During leadership transitions. A new leader inheriting an existing organisation, or an organisation seeking to shift its culture under new leadership, needs to understand existing assumptions before attempting to introduce new ones.
- When onboarding reveals persistent misunderstandings. If new employees consistently struggle to adapt or frequently report that "the way things actually work" differs from what they were told, this signals a misalignment between espoused values and underlying assumptions that needs to be surfaced.
- During strategic planning. When developing or refreshing organisational strategy, leaders benefit from understanding which of their organisation's assumptions will support the new direction and which will work against it.
The model is equally relevant for business students analysing case studies: rather than simply describing what an organisation does, Schein encourages analysts to ask why - and to keep asking until they reach the level of assumption.
How to use it
Applying Schein's model in practice is fundamentally a process of cultural archaeology - moving progressively from what is visible to what is deeply buried. The following steps outline a practical methodology.
Step 1: Map the Artefacts
Begin by cataloguing the observable elements of organisational life. This includes the physical environment, dress codes, organisational structures, rituals, ceremonies, stories, and the language people use. Resist the temptation to interpret these at face value. Document them as data points that require explanation. Useful questions include: What does the physical space communicate about status and power? Which behaviours are publicly celebrated? What stories are repeatedly told about the organisation or its founders?
Step 2: Elicit Espoused Values
Review formal documents - mission statements, value declarations, strategic plans, codes of conduct - and conduct interviews with leaders and employees to understand what the organisation says it believes. Crucially, compare these stated values against the artefacts identified in Step 1. Where do the two align? Where are there contradictions? The gaps between espoused and enacted values are frequently where the most culturally significant information resides.
Step 3: Surface the Underlying Assumptions
This is the most challenging step, as underlying assumptions are precisely those beliefs that organisational members do not normally articulate because they take them entirely for granted. Effective techniques include: facilitated workshops in which participants are invited to explain cultural anomalies ("why do we always do it this way?"); ethnographic observation by an external consultant who can notice what insiders no longer see; and critical incident analysis, in which significant organisational events are examined for what they reveal about deep-seated beliefs.
Step 4: Assess Alignment and Design Interventions
Once all three levels have been mapped, the practitioner can identify where cultural elements support organisational goals and where they impede them. Importantly, Schein cautions that cultural change should not be attempted without first understanding existing assumptions. Interventions that target only artefacts (such as rebranding exercises) or espoused values (such as new value statement posters) will be superficial and likely short-lived if the underlying assumptions remain intact. Lasting cultural change requires deliberate attention to those deeper layers, typically through sustained leadership modelling, symbolic actions, and changes to reward and recognition systems.
For students writing case analyses, the model can serve as an analytical framework: structure your analysis by examining each level in turn, then synthesise your findings to draw conclusions about the organisation's overall cultural coherence and its implications for strategy or performance.
Related models
MBA Management Models
MBA Management Models
Further reading
Deal, T. E. and Kennedy, A. A. (1982) Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D. and Regner, P. (2017) Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases, 11th Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Kotter, J. P. (2012) Leading Change. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
Lewin, K. (1947) "Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change", Human Relations, 1(1), pp. 5–41.
Martin, J. (2002) Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Schein, E. H. (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. (2013) Humble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Schein, E. H. (2017) Organizational Culture and Leadership, 5th Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Schein, E. H. and Schein, P. A. (2018) Humble Leadership: The Power of Relationships, Openness and Trust. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Tierney, W. G. (1988) "Organizational culture in higher education: defining the essentials", Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), pp. 2–21.
Some of the links to products provided in this article are affiliate links. This means that the supplier may pay the owner of this website a small amount of money for purchases made via the link. This will have absolutely no impact on the amount you pay.